B2B Marketing · Benchmarks 2026

B2B SaaS Google Ads Benchmarks 2026: CPC, CPA vs LinkedIn

Real data from 2,000+ SaaS campaigns to tell you whether your CPC, CVR, CPL, and ROAS are on target, above, or below the market for your segment.

K
By Kampaio TeamB2B PPC AnalystsJune 1, 2026 · Updated August 17, 2026 · 16 min read

B2B SaaS Google Ads benchmarks diverge from cross-industry averages because the conversion event is a demo request or free trial signup, not a purchase. Average SaaS CPC reached $5.34 in 2026 - up 29% year-over-year - with cost per lead ranging from $87 for SMB to over $1,500 for enterprise. WordStream industry averages do not apply to SaaS.

2026 B2B SaaS Benchmark Snapshot

$5.34
Avg. non-branded CPC
+29% YoY (Involve Digital)
3-5%
Search CVR (click to demo)
vs. 8.18% cross-industry (WordStream)
$87-$1,500+
CPL range by segment
SMB to Enterprise (42 Agency)
553%
Search pipeline ROAS
vs. 436% PMax (42 Agency, 2022-2026)

TL;DR

  • B2B SaaS average CPC on Search: $5.34 in 2026, up 29% year-over-year (Involve Digital, 500+ SaaS campaigns).
  • Average conversion rate (click to demo/trial): 3-5% for Search campaigns; 0.64% for Display.
  • Cost per lead by segment: SMB SaaS $87-$200, mid-market $200-$900, enterprise $1,500-$4,500 (42 Agency real campaign data).
  • Target ROAS baseline: Search campaigns at 553% vs. Performance Max at 436% in B2B accounts (42 Agency, 2022-2026 campaign exports).
  • AI Overviews reduced paid CTR 68% on informational queries; high-intent transactional keywords are unaffected - shift budget to transactional terms accordingly.

If your CPC is above $8 and your CVR is below 2%, the problem is likely match type mix or landing page relevance - not market conditions. See why your Google Ads cost per click is too high for a diagnostic checklist.

📊Echo· Reporting
Here is the 2026 benchmark card for a mid-market SaaS account with $20K/month budget. These are the top-quartile targets, not medians. CPC (non-branded Search): $3.50-$4.50 vs. $5.34 median. CTR: 4.5%+ vs. 2.86% median. CVR (click to demo/trial): 6-8% vs. 3-5% median. Cost per Lead: under $87 vs. $87-$200 median. ROAS (Search): 700%+ vs. 553% median. Top-quartile requires a 3:1 LTV:CAC minimum - 5:1 puts you in the top tier. (Benchmarks sourced from Involve Digital 2026 and 42 Agency 2022-2026 datasets. Not a guarantee of individual account results.)

Why B2B SaaS Benchmarks Are Different From the Industry Average

B2B SaaS Google Ads benchmarks differ from cross-industry averages because the conversion event is a demo request or free trial signup from a buying committee with an 84-day average sales cycle, not a "buy now" click from a single consumer. The table below shows what this structural difference produces in practice.

MetricIndustry Avg (WordStream 2026)B2B SaaS Avg (2026)
Average CPC$5.42$3.33-$6.29 (see note)
Average CTR6.64%1.30-2.86%
Average CVR8.18%3-5% (click to demo/trial)
Average CPA / CPL$66.69$87-$606+

CPC note: DigitalApplied reports blended B2B/SaaS CPC at $3.33; Involve Digital reports non-branded SaaS CPC at $5.34; 42 Agency reports overall B2B managed accounts at $6.29. These measure different things. Do not average them.

The WordStream cross-industry average includes e-commerce and local services where a conversion is a single "add to cart" click from one person. B2B SaaS conversion requires a human demo from a team, or a multi-step trial activation by a buyer who has reviewed 11 pieces of content before contacting you (Sopro, 2025). That structural difference is why SaaS CTR sits at 1.30-2.86% while the industry average is 6.64%, and why SaaS CPL ranges from $87 to over $1,500 while the industry CPA is $66.69.

Applying the WordStream number to a SaaS account is not wrong - it is simply measuring a different thing. This article measures your thing.

B2B SaaS Google Ads Benchmarks at a Glance (2026 Data)

The 2026 benchmark summary below covers all key metrics for B2B SaaS Search campaigns, sourced from verified campaign datasets totaling 2,000+ SaaS accounts (Involve Digital) and real Google Ads exports from B2B client accounts managed by 42 Agency from 2022-2026.

MetricSMB SaaS (<200 employees)Mid-Market SaaS (200-1,000)Enterprise SaaS (1,000+)
Avg CPC (non-branded Search)$3.33-$5.34$5.34-$7.00$7.00-$12.00+
Click-through Rate2.86%1.30-2.86%1.30-2.00%
CVR (click to demo/trial)3.82-5%3-5%2-4%
Cost per Lead (CPL)$87-$200$200-$900$1,500-$4,500
Cost per MQL$200-$400$400-$1,100$900-$1,500
ROAS (Search campaigns)553% baseline553% baseline553% baseline
ROAS (Performance Max)436% baseline436% baseline436% baseline

Sources: DigitalApplied 2026 (B2B/SaaS row); Involve Digital 2026 SaaS benchmark guide (500+ campaigns); 42 Agency 2026 benchmark dataset (real Google Ads exports, 2022-2026).

What counts as top-quartile?

Involve Digital cites a 3:1 LTV:CAC ratio as the SaaS industry standard. Top-quartile companies achieve 5:1 or better. CAC payback period for private SaaS in 2026 sits at 23 months median. If your Search ROAS is above 700% and your CPL is below the segment median above, you are in top-quartile territory. If your CPL is on target but your pipeline quality is low, that is a separate problem - our guide to B2B Google Ads low-quality leads covers how to filter and score leads upstream.

🐝Buzz· Bidding
A SaaS account with $187 CPL on Search for a $299/month product looks above the $87 DigitalApplied median. Here is the math before you optimize it down. At a 25% trial-to-paid rate and $299 MRR, the 12-month LTV is approximately $3,588. A $187 CAC gives you a 19:1 LTV:CAC ratio - well above the 3:1 minimum. Your CPA is above the market median, but your unit economics are fine. Scaling spend here is the correct call, not cutting CPA. (Illustrative example - not a real Kampaio account result.)

CPC Benchmarks for B2B SaaS in 2026 - and Why They Rose 29%

Average non-branded B2B SaaS CPC reached $5.34 in 2026, a 29% year-over-year increase, according to Involve Digital's benchmark guide covering 500+ SaaS campaigns. Branded search remains dramatically cheaper: brand campaign ROAS regularly hits 1,200%+ in SaaS accounts, which is why brand protection campaigns should be non-negotiable in any SaaS budget.

Two structural factors drove the 29% CPC increase - and understanding them changes how you respond.

First, AI Overviews reduced paid CTR by 68% on informational queries (Involve Digital, 2026). Informational queries lost paid traffic; high-intent transactional queries held. Buyers who would previously research on organic results now see an AI-generated answer instead, compressing the organic click pool and pushing those remaining high-intent buyers into the paid auction. More competition on fewer high-value queries drives CPC up.

Second, AI Max - Google's new campaign management layer - is being adopted by sophisticated SaaS advertisers, increasing bidding competition on exact-match intent keywords. Involve Digital reports AI Max generated 14% more conversions at similar CPA compared to standard Search campaigns, and a 27% improvement specifically for exact and phrase match campaigns. As more accounts activate AI Max, auction density on high-intent terms increases further.

Updated August 2026: a dataset published after this article went live reframes the cost story. Pipe Rocket Digital's 100+ B2B SaaS Google Ads benchmarks report, built from 65+ B2B SaaS accounts the agency actively manages across 24 months of real performance data (July 2024 through June 2026), puts blended CPC at $6.81 and essentially flat year over year at -1%. Over that same window blended cost per lead fell 44% to $84, because conversion rate rose 48% to 2.57% at a 3.60% CTR. The efficiency B2B SaaS accounts gained in 2026 came from the landing page and the conversion side of the funnel, not from cheaper clicks.

The two figures are not in conflict, and neither one replaces the other. Involve Digital's $5.34, up 29%, measures non-branded Search keywords: the price of attention from a buyer who has never heard of you. Pipe Rocket's $6.81, down 1%, is a blended average across every campaign type in a managed portfolio, brand traffic included. Both numbers can describe the same account in the same quarter. If your non-branded CPC is climbing while your blended CPC sits still, that is exactly what the two datasets predict.

The match type split matters more than raw CPC. Understanding how keyword match types affect your Google Ads spend is the prerequisite for reading this data correctly. Using 42 Agency campaign data, cost per MQL breaks down as follows:

Cost per MQL by Match Type

Source: 42 Agency B2B client accounts, 2022-2026 campaign exports

Exact Match
Highest intent, lowest waste$1,200
Phrase Match
Mid-range quality signal$2,800
Broad Match
High volume, high waste risk$4,000+

A $12 CPC on exact match that converts at 8% beats a $4 CPC on broad match that converts at 1%. Cost per MQL is the signal that matters.

A $12 CPC on exact match that converts at 8% beats a $4 CPC on broad match that converts at 1%. The question is not "what is my CPC?" but "what is my cost per MQL by match type?"

The branded vs. non-branded CPC gap is equally important. Non-branded SaaS keywords - competitor conquesting and category terms - sit at $5.34+. Brand terms typically cost $0.50-$2.00 and convert at 3-5x the rate of non-branded terms. A SaaS company spending 0% on brand protection is leaving the highest-ROAS segment in the account undefended.

Conversion Rate and CPL Benchmarks by SaaS Segment

B2B SaaS Search conversion rate (click to demo or free trial) averages 3-5% for well-structured accounts. This is below the 8.18% cross-industry average (WordStream) because B2B SaaS conversion requires a higher-friction action from a buyer with a longer decision timeline - not a single-click purchase.

The full funnel conversion rate stack, sourced from Involve Digital's 2026 SaaS benchmark guide:

B2B SaaS conversion funnel from ad click to closed-won. Click-to-customer rate: 0.5-1.5% overall. Each stage is a distinct benchmark, not just the top-of-funnel click.

This funnel structure is what distinguishes SaaS from e-commerce, where click-to-purchase can be a single step. A B2B SaaS account with a 4% landing page conversion rate and a 15% MQL-to-SQL rate has a blended click-to-customer rate around 0.3-0.6%. Every stage in the funnel is a benchmark, not just the top-of-funnel click - and the further down the funnel you look, the faster you can diagnose where volume is actually leaking.

Connecting conversion rate to CPL targets requires the math that matters before a quarterly review. A SaaS product with a $15,000 average ARR and a 3:1 LTV:CAC target (assuming 3-year retention at $15K = $45K LTV, maximum CAC = $15,000) means the maximum allowable CPL at a 30-day trial-to-paid rate of 18-25% is approximately $300-$600 per qualified lead. That number, not the industry median, is the CPL ceiling for that specific product.

Trial-to-paid conversion benchmarks from Involve Digital: opt-in trials (no card required) convert at 18-25%, with 7-day trials converting higher than 14-day trials in current data. For SaaS teams running free trial campaigns, this is the conversion event to track in Google Ads - not form fills. For the upstream campaign structure that feeds this funnel, our B2B Google Ads lead generation guide covers account setup, targeting, and lead qualification in detail.

One caveat before you compare your own CPL against any blended figure. In the Pipe Rocket Digital dataset covering 65+ managed B2B SaaS accounts from July 2024 to June 2026, non-brand traffic costs $207 per lead at a $13.75 CPC, while brand traffic costs $34 per lead at a $3.12 CPC. Brand CTR runs 22.2% against 3.6% for non-brand. That means the blended $84 CPL is less a measure of media efficiency than a measure of how much brand demand sits in the mix. Two accounts can report an identical blended CPL while one is buying new pipeline and the other is invoicing itself for demand it already had.

🦉Sage· Research
A SaaS account with a blended CPL of $90 looks on-benchmark. But the keyword breakdown tells a different story: 67% of conversions are coming from branded terms at a $27 CPL, and only 33% from non-branded terms at a $340 CPL. The blended number is fine; the structure is not. If a competitor starts conquesting your brand terms, your $90 blended CPL becomes $340 overnight. My recommendation: shift 20% of brand budget to non-branded exact-match terms over 90 days and rebuild the non-branded CPL baseline before it becomes a crisis. (Illustrative example - not a real Kampaio account result.)

ROAS Benchmarks - and Why SaaS ROAS Is Calculated Differently

B2B SaaS ROAS is not a simple revenue-divided-by-spend ratio because the closed-won revenue from a Google Ads click lands in your CRM 84 days after the click, not at checkout. First-touch ROAS for non-branded SaaS sits at approximately 78% (Involve Digital) - which looks like a failed campaign until you account for the full pipeline attribution window.

Two ROAS frameworks apply to SaaS. First-touch attributed ROAS captures the immediate conversion signal (demo booked or trial started) but systematically underestimates true value because pipeline closes after the standard 30-day attribution window. Pipeline-attributed ROAS uses offline conversion import from your CRM, linking closed-won deals back to the originating Google Ads click. The difference between these two methods is not rounding error: 78% first-touch ROAS vs. 553% pipeline-attributed ROAS (42 Agency, 2022-2026 B2B account data) are both arithmetically correct for their respective attribution methodologies.

ROAS by Attribution Method and Campaign Type

All three numbers are arithmetically correct for their respective methods. They are not interchangeable.

Pipeline-attributed Search ROAS553%
42 Agency, 2022-2026
Performance Max ROAS436%
42 Agency, 2022-2026
First-touch Search ROAS78%
Involve Digital (30-day window)

We see accounts pause profitable campaigns because first-touch ROAS looks bad. The number is not wrong; the attribution window is wrong.

Search vs. Performance Max ROAS benchmarks from 42 Agency's B2B Google Ads benchmark dataset:

  • Search campaigns: 553% ROAS
  • Performance Max: 436% ROAS

PMax has a lower ROAS benchmark despite Google's automation claims because PMax inventory in B2B accounts skews toward Display and YouTube when the campaign lacks sufficient conversion data. Display CVR in B2B SaaS is 0.64% vs. 3.82% for Search (DigitalApplied, 2026). The practical implication: do not replace your Search ROAS baseline with PMax until you have 60+ conversions per month feeding the algorithm.

The preferred SaaS ROAS alternative is LTV:CAC ratio. Industry standard: 3:1. Top-quartile: 5:1. CAC payback period for private SaaS in 2026: 23 months median (Involve Digital's 2026 B2B SaaS Google Ads benchmark data). If your annual contract value is $12,000 and your LTV is $36,000 (3-year retention), your maximum allowable CAC is $12,000. Your Google Ads program's blended CPL target is that CAC divided by your expected close rate.

Performance Max Benchmarks for B2B SaaS in 2026

Performance Max benchmarks for B2B SaaS sit below Search in ROAS (436% vs. 553%) and require a minimum conversion data threshold before the algorithm performs reliably. PMax is a supplementary channel for SaaS, not a Search replacement.

Three operational PMax realities for SaaS in 2026 that the flat benchmark number does not capture:

Conversion data threshold. PMax needs 50+ conversions in a 30-day period to exit Learning Mode and optimize effectively. Below that threshold, PMax defaults to display-heavy inventory at 0.64% CVR vs. 3.82% for Search in B2B SaaS (DigitalApplied, 2026). Most SMB SaaS accounts run below this threshold - which means most SMB accounts activating PMax are paying display rates for display results while assuming they are getting Search-quality traffic. If PMax is already live and underperforming, the Performance Max not converting diagnostic covers the most common root causes and fixes.

Search campaign cannibalization. PMax will bid on brand terms and Search campaign keywords unless you apply account-level negative keyword lists. This inflates PMax's attributed conversions while suppressing Search attribution. Fix: apply a negative keyword list that excludes all Search campaign exact-match terms from PMax. See our negative keyword strategy for SaaS guide for implementation.

Asset group performance. Text assets in PMax perform above average for B2B SaaS when they mirror the Search campaign's top-performing RSA headlines. Image and video assets underperform in B2B because buyers are not visual-led in the evaluation phase.

On the Demand Gen side: Involve Digital reports Demand Gen CPM is 58% lower than LinkedIn, and Demand Gen CTR is 2.8x higher than standard display. For SaaS teams that rely on LinkedIn Ads for top-of-funnel, Demand Gen now offers a credible lower-cost alternative worth benchmarking against your LinkedIn CPL.

Performance Max: Use vs. Skip

Use Performance Max When

  • Search campaigns generate 60+ conversions/month
  • You have an established Search ROAS baseline
  • Goal is to scale volume beyond current impression share
  • Text assets mirror top-performing RSA headlines
  • Account-level negative lists exclude Search exact-match terms

Skip Performance Max When

  • Search campaigns have fewer than 60 conversions/month
  • You are launching a new SaaS product
  • Budget is under $5K/month (PMax needs margin to test placements)
  • No account-level negative keyword list in place
  • You cannot track offline CRM conversions in Google Ads

See our guide on Smart Bidding for B2B lead gen for the conversion threshold detail behind this decision.

How These Compare to LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks

Google Ads is rarely the only paid channel in a B2B SaaS mix, and the second one is almost always LinkedIn. The two are usually compared on cost per click, which is the least useful comparison available: they buy different intent at different points in the funnel. Google captures someone already searching for a solution. LinkedIn interrupts someone who fits the profile but is not looking yet. The numbers below are worth reading as two different purchases, not as a price list.

The published benchmarks disagree with each other, and that is the first thing to know. Two 2026 sources with different methods put B2B SaaS LinkedIn CPC almost two-fold apart:

B2B SaaS on LinkedInDigital Applied, Q1 2026GrowthSpree, 2026
CPC$6.04$8 to $15
CTR0.74%0.44% to 0.65%
CPL, lead gen form$79$75 to $150
CPL, landing pagenot reported$100 to $250
Lead gen form CVR8.2%not reported
Cost per SQLnot reported$500 to $1,500

Both are vendor-stated, and neither is an independent audit. Digital Applied describes its figures as aggregated from LinkedIn Marketing Solutions, AdStage, Hootsuite, Demand Gen Report and HubSpot survey data cross-referenced with agency-managed accounts, comparing Q1 2026 against Q1 2025. GrowthSpree states its numbers come from managing more than $60M in ad spend across 300+ B2B SaaS accounts, without publishing the period or whether the figures are medians or means. Treat the ranges as calibration, not as a target, and weight the source whose method resembles your own account.

Vertical spread is wider than the gap between sources. GrowthSpree reports cybersecurity and fintech at $12 to $18 CPC against $5 to $9 for HR tech and manufacturing. A single blended LinkedIn CPC number describes almost no real account, which is the same warning that applies to the Google Ads figures earlier on this page.

What this means for the channel split. On the Google Ads side of this page, B2B SaaS search CPC sits well below the LinkedIn range while search CVR sits well above LinkedIn landing page CVR, which is what you would expect when one channel serves demand and the other creates it. The practical read is not that one channel is cheaper. It is that LinkedIn CPL and Google CPL are not the same unit, and comparing them directly is how B2B SaaS teams end up defunding the channel that fills the top of the funnel. If you are running both, compare them at cost per SQL and at deal size, not at cost per click. And if LinkedIn top-of-funnel cost is the problem you are actually trying to solve, the Demand Gen comparison in the section above is the cheaper first test.

How to Read These Benchmarks for Your Account

Benchmarks are calibration tools, not performance targets. A B2B SaaS account with a $87 CPA and 3% CVR is not automatically healthy. If the average deal size is $2,000 ARR, that CPA is profitable. If the deal size is $500 ARR, it is not. Context is everything - the benchmark tells you where to look, not what to conclude.

A 3-step framework for applying these benchmarks to your account:

  1. Compare your metric to the segment median. Find your SaaS segment (SMB, mid-market, enterprise) in the table above. Compare your CPC, CVR, and CPL to the range for your segment, not the flat average.
  2. Calculate whether your current CPA supports a 3:1 LTV:CAC ratio. Take your average ARR, multiply by expected customer lifetime in years, and set 33% of that number as your maximum CAC. If your CPL is below that ceiling, your account is mathematically profitable regardless of what the benchmark median shows.
  3. Identify the single biggest gap. CPC above benchmark: the problem is keyword mix or Quality Score - not market conditions. CVR below benchmark: the problem is landing page relevance or offer mismatch. CPL above benchmark with CVR at benchmark: the problem is lead quality (your demo-bookers are not converting to SQL).

Benchmarks-as-excuses is a real pattern we see in quarterly reviews. Some SaaS advertisers use high-CPC benchmarks as justification for underperformance rather than as a diagnosis prompt. If your CPC matches the market but your CVR is half the benchmark, the market is not your problem.

Kampaio tracks your account performance against these segment benchmarks automatically, flags deviations from your CPL and ROAS targets, and adjusts bids to maintain CPA or ROAS within your defined range. See how Kampaio tracks SaaS Google Ads benchmarks automatically for the setup.

Know where you stand against the 2026 benchmarks?

Kampaio compares your SaaS account to segment benchmarks automatically, flags CPL and ROAS deviations, and adjusts bids before performance drifts.

Start Free Benchmark Audit

FAQ

What is the average CPC for B2B SaaS Google Ads in 2026?

B2B SaaS Google Ads CPC averages $5.34 for non-branded Search keywords in 2026, up 29% year-over-year (Involve Digital, 500+ SaaS campaigns). Blended CPC including branded terms is lower: DigitalApplied reports $3.33 for the B2B/SaaS category across all campaign types. The two figures measure different things - use the $5.34 non-branded figure for competitive keyword planning.

What is a good conversion rate for B2B SaaS Google Ads?

B2B SaaS Google Ads Search conversion rate (click to demo or trial) averages 3-5% for well-structured accounts. This is below the 8.18% cross-industry average (WordStream, 2026) because SaaS conversion requires a higher-friction action from a buyer mid-research cycle, not a single-click purchase. A CVR above 5% on non-branded Search is a strong result for B2B SaaS.

What is the average cost per lead for B2B SaaS Google Ads?

B2B SaaS cost per lead varies by segment: SMB-targeting SaaS averages $87-$200 CPL, mid-market SaaS $200-$900, and enterprise SaaS $1,500-$4,500 (42 Agency, real Google Ads campaign exports, 2022-2026). Blended CPL across 65+ managed B2B SaaS accounts was $84 in the 24 months to June 2026, down 44% year over year, but that blend hides the split: $207 per lead on non-brand traffic vs. $34 on brand (Pipe Rocket Digital, July 2024 to June 2026). The flat industry CPL average of $66.69 (WordStream, 2026) is not applicable to SaaS - it blends e-commerce and local services with structurally lower-friction conversions.

Should B2B SaaS companies use Performance Max?

B2B SaaS companies should use Performance Max as a supplementary channel once Search campaigns generate 60+ conversions per month. Below that threshold, PMax defaults to display-heavy inventory at 0.64% CVR vs. 3.82% for Search (DigitalApplied, 2026). PMax ROAS benchmarks for B2B accounts sit at 436% vs. 553% for Search (42 Agency). Run Search first, add PMax to scale.

How much should a B2B SaaS company spend on Google Ads?

B2B SaaS Google Ads budgets range from $5K-$15K per month for SMB-targeting products to $15K-$50K for mid-market SaaS and $50K+ for enterprise. The floor is determined by conversion threshold math: your budget must be large enough to generate 30 conversions per month per campaign for Smart Bidding to function (Google Ads Help, 2024). At a $150 CPL, that requires a minimum $4,500/month per campaign.

Why did my B2B SaaS Google Ads CPC increase in 2026?

B2B SaaS CPCs increased 29% year-over-year in 2026 for two structural reasons. First, AI Overviews suppressed paid CTR by 68% on informational queries (Involve Digital, 2026), concentrating competition onto high-intent transactional keywords. Second, AI Max adoption by sophisticated SaaS advertisers increased bidding competition on exact-match intent terms. The increase is concentrated on non-branded category and competitor terms, not brand keywords.

How do I calculate ROAS for B2B SaaS Google Ads?

B2B SaaS ROAS is best calculated using pipeline-attributed ROAS via offline conversion import from your CRM, which links closed-won deals back to originating Google Ads clicks. First-touch ROAS (conversions tracked within the 30-day attribution window) systematically underestimates true value because SaaS deals close 84 days after the first click on average. The benchmark for pipeline-attributed Search ROAS in B2B accounts is 553% (42 Agency, 2022-2026 data).

Sources

  1. Involve Digital. "Google Ads for B2B SaaS: Strategy Guide 2026." involvedigital.com
  2. 42 Agency. "B2B Google Ads Benchmarks 2026." intel.42agency.com
  3. WordStream. "Google Ads Benchmarks 2026: Competitive Data & Insights for Every Industry." wordstream.com
  4. DigitalApplied. "Google Ads Benchmarks 2026: CPC, CTR, CVR by Industry." digitalapplied.com
  5. Pipe Rocket Digital. "100+ B2B SaaS Google Ads Benchmarks." First-party dataset, 65+ actively managed B2B SaaS accounts, July 2024 to June 2026. Updated August 6, 2026. piperocket.digital
  6. DigitalApplied. "LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks 2026: CPC, CTR, CVR by Industry." Vendor-stated; aggregated from LinkedIn Marketing Solutions, AdStage, Hootsuite, Demand Gen Report and HubSpot survey data cross-referenced with agency-managed accounts, Q1 2026 vs Q1 2025. digitalapplied.com
  7. GrowthSpree. "B2B SaaS LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks 2026." Vendor-stated; from management of $60M+ in ad spend across 300+ B2B SaaS accounts. Period and central-tendency method not published. growthspreeofficial.com
  8. Sopro. B2B buyer research behavior data. 2025. Cited via SalesHive. saleshive.com
  9. Google Ads Help. "Smart Bidding: About bidding strategies." 2024. support.google.com

Results may vary. This article is informational and does not constitute professional advice. Benchmark figures are sourced from third-party datasets and represent aggregated campaign data, not guarantees of individual account performance.

Keep reading